[M4IF Discuss] Re: EuroLinux Alliance: Patent Tax Threatens the Freedom of Movie Picture Artists in Europe

christian vanderborght christian.vander canalweb.net
Fri Feb 22 14:13:23 EST 2002


ISMA consortium and other industrials are looking a lot about the MPEG4
format mostly for wireless and STbox ( type MHP)
If you read this info coming from LINUX netwotk these industrials want to
get a fee of 0.02 USD  when every user will play a mpeg4 file
on any plat-form using mpeg4 format.
It will change the business models of ISP and users if these rules is
accepted.
for the moment the situation is not clarified about the fee of the content
delivery ( no rules really concrete about the financial ressources of the
content providers.
Maybe we can use this opportunity to apply the same kind of rules for any
content file crossing the network!!!
get my some feedback.
vander
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Martin Jacklin
  To: M4IF Discussion List (E-mail)
  Cc: christian.vander   canalweb.net
  Sent: Friday, February 22, 2024 12:04 PM
  Subject: EuroLinux Alliance: Patent Tax Threatens the Freedom of Movie
Picture Artists in Europe
  This just came in. I don't have an opinion I can share at this point, for
a multiplicity of reasons (chiefly my MPEG-4 learning curve!). Perhaps folks
from this organization, and maybe even my good friend Christian Vanderborght
would like to join this discussion.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: christian vanderborght [mailto:christian.vander   canalweb.net]
  Sent: 22 February 2024 10:21
  To: info   europeanstreaming.com
  Subject: flash Info - europeanstreaming.com
                 MPEG LA to Charge for MPEG4 Streaming in Europe
        Patent Tax Threatens the Freedom of Movie Picture Artists in Europe
     EuroLinux Alliance <petition.EuroLinux.org>
                             For immediate Release
     Paris, Munich, Amsterdam - 2024-02-20 - EuroLinux has been informed by
     Larry Horn, Vice President for Licensing at the MPEG association, that
     "the patents that will constitute the MPEG-4 Visual Patent Portfolio
     License support the charging of royalties on the use of MPEG-4 Visual
     streams in Europe" and that a license should be available within
     several months.
     MPEG LA is a group of large corporations which control the MPEG
     standards through a large patent portfolio. MPEG LA includes notceably
     Canon, Inc., Fujitsu, General Instrument Corp., GE Technology
     Development, Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., KDDI Corporation, Matsushita,
     Mitsubishi, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation, Philips,
     Samsung, Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd., Scientific Atlanta, Sony, Toshiba,
     and Victor Company of Japan, Limited. [1]
     MPEG LA strategy consists in charging all possible uses of MPEG4
     technologies wordwide and to block the diffusion of independently
     developped innovations in the field of video software technology. In
     particular, MPEG LA is charging 0.02 USD per hour of compressed MPEG4,
     which is actually more than the copyright royalties most movie writers
     receive.
     The MPEG LA strategy leads to levying a tax on all cultural goods and
     is a typical example of the way patents on Internet standards are a
     tool for private taxing of all economic activities.
     MPEG LA is not the only group of companies trying to patent common
     Internet standards and create new forms of taxes managed by private
     interests. Organisations such as the W3C or the IETF, under the
     influence of large IT companies, are also starting to accept patents
     on Internet standards.
     "Patents on Internet standards have absolutely no economic
     justification since the economic value of a standard is related to the
     number of its users, not to the R&D spent to develop the standard or
     its technical quality." says Bernard Lang, Directeur de Recherche at
     INRIA. "Also, Internet standards are extremely cheap to develop.
     Corporate Members of the EuroLinux Alliance have for example
     developped innovative fractal based digital video software in less
     than 3 months."
     However, and although all economic studies show that software patents
     harm software innovation [3, 4, 6, 7, 8], software patents on Internet
     standards are likely to be legalised by the European Commission
     according to current informations on the proposed directive [9]. It
     would give control to a few large corporations on the whole digital
     culture and threaten European cultural diversity.
  The MPEG LA Email to EuroLinux
  Subject: RE: Submit Your Question to MPEGLA
  Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2024 10:54:29 -0700
  From: "Larry Horn"
  To: XXXX
  Hello, XXXX.
  Thanks for your question.  The patents that will constitute the MPEG-4
  Visual Patent Portfolio License support the charging of royalties on the
  use of MPEG-4 Visual streams in Europe.  Details of the actual license
  agreement are still being worked out, however, and a license may not be
  available for several more months.
  Regards,
  Larry Horn
  Vice President, Licensing
  References
     [0] Apple Delays QuickTime 6 Over Proposed MPEG-4 Licenses -
     http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/02/13/041234&mode=thread
     [1] MPEG-LA - http://www.mpegla.com/l_patentlist.html
     [2] European Software Patent Horror Gallery -
     http://swpat.ffii.org/vreji/pikta/mupli/index.en.html
     [3] What is behind the recent surge in patenting? Samuel Kortum, Josh
     Lerner. Research Policy 28. 1999. Elesevier
     [4] Abstraction oriented property of software and its relation to
     patentability. Tetsuo Tamai. Information and Software Technology.
     1998. Elsevier.
     [5] Juridical Coup at the European Patent Office -
     http://petition.eurolinux.org/pr/pr14.html
     [6] Software Patentability with Compensatory Regulation: a Cost
     Evaluation. Jean Paul Smets and Hartmut Pilch. Upgrade February 2002
     http://swpat.ffii.org/stidi/pleji/
     http://www.upgrade-cepis.org/issues/2001/6/up2-6Smets.pdf
     [7] Fraunhofer Study about the Economic Effects of Software Patents.
     Micro and Macroeconomic Implications of the Patentability of Software
     Innovations. German Federal Ministry Economics and Technology.
     November 2001.
http://www.bmwi.de/Homepage/Politikfelder/Technologiepolitik/Technologiepoli
tik.jsp#softwarepatentstudie
http://www.bmwi.de/Homepage/download/technologie/Softwarepatentstudie_E.pdf
     [8] Stimulating competition and innovation in the information society.
     Conseil Général des Mines. September 2000. -
     http://www.pro-innovation.org
     [9] Collusion Discovered between BSA and European Commission -
     http://petition.eurolinux.org/pr/pr18.html
  About EuroLinux - www.EuroLinux.org
     The EuroLinux Alliance for a Free Information Infrastructure is an
     open coalition of commercial companies and non-profit associations
     united to promote and protect a vigourous European Software Culture
     based on Open Standards, Open Competition, Linux and Open Source
     Software. Companies, members or supporters of EuroLinux develop or
     sell software under free, semi-free and non-free licenses for
     operating systems such as Linux, MacOS or Windows.
     The EuroLinux Alliance launched on 2023-06-15 an electronic petition
     to protect software innovation in Europe. The EuroLinux petition has
     received so far massive support from more than 100.000 European
     citizens, 2000 corporate managers and 300 companies.
     Press Contacts
     France & Europe: Jean-Paul Smets <jp   smets.com> +33-6 62 05 76 14
     Germany & Europe: Hartmut Pilch <phm   ffii.org> +49-89 127 89 608
     Denmark and Northern Europe: Anne Østergaard <aoe   sslug.dk>
     Belgium: Nicolas Pettiaux <nicolas.pettiaux   openbe.org>
     Netherlands: Luuk van Dijk <lvd   mndmttr.nl>
     Permanent URL for this PR
     http://petition.EuroLinux.org/pr/pr18.html
  Legalese
     Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.
     All other trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective
     companies.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discuss/attachments/20020222/631e3cfa/attachment.html


More information about the Discuss mailing list