[M4IF Discuss] VP3.2

[Ben Waggoner]

Charles,
    It¹s only a video codec, which means it only handles a very small part
of what MPEG-4 can do. Thus, it doesn¹t give any audio, systems, or
streaming support.
    The codec itself is a great CD-ROM/progressive download option for
QuickTime and AVI. It lacks a native packetizer, so isn¹t well suited for
RTSP streaming.
    I don¹t see it as a viable alternative, although it could be a component
of one.
Ben Waggoner
Interframe Media <http://www.interframemedia.com>
Digital Video Compression Consulting, Training, and Encoding
on 2/24/02 9:16 AM, Charles Vo at cvo7651   yahoo.com wrote:
> What is the general opinion of VP3.2 in the MPEG development community?  Is it
> a viable alternative?  I believe it is free of royalties and licensing fees.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/discuss/attachments/20020224/82c6f585/attachment.html