[M4IF Discuss] Apple settles MPEG-4 dispute?
Rob Koenen
rkoenen intertrust.com
Wed Jun 5 08:29:13 EDT 2002
Thanks Craig.
As an FYI - articles like these are usually linked from
our homepage, www.m4if.org
All - If you find one that isn't linked from the homepage,
you can register them here:
http://www.m4if.org/news/newsregister.php
With respect to this arcticle - I pointed out to Paul that
it wasn't MPEG-4 that proposed licensing terms, but a number
of owners of patents that are essential to MPEG-4's
implementation.
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig Birkmaier [mailto:craig pcube.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2023 5:26
> To: discuss lists.m4if.org
> Subject: [M4IF Discuss] Apple settles MPEG-4 dispute?
>
>
> http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-932224.html
>
> Apple settles MPEG-4 dispute?
> By Joe Wilcox
> Special to ZDNet News
> June 4, 2002, 1:35 PM PT
>
> Apple Computer on Tuesday released a public preview of QuickTime 6,
> signaling the possible end of a heated dispute between the computer
> maker and a licensing group that controls the use of MPEG-4 media
> technology.
>
> The computer maker took the unusual step of releasing the software in
> absence of a final licensing agreement with MPEG LA, a licensing body
> representing 18 patent holders that have claims on underlying MPEG-4
> technology, a next-generation compression format for video and audio.
>
> "The licensing stuff is getting worked out," Apple CEO Steve Jobs
> said in an interview Tuesday. Every 'i' is not dotted and every 't'
> is not crossed, but it's getting there. I have a lot of confidence it
> will. This is too important not to get worked out."
>
> Jobs said he believed the MPEG-4 licensing issues "will be worked
> out" by the time QuickTime 6 is officially released later this summer.
>
> Jobs emphasized that MPEG-4 would be vital to more broadly opening up
> streaming of audio or video on the Web and giving consumers more
> choice. Right now, much of the streaming is tied to proprietary
> codecs used by Apple, RealNetworks or Microsoft.
>
> "MPEG-2 still delivers the best video quality around," Jobs said. "It
> is the gold standard. It is the world standard...The same group that
> created MPEG-2, created MPEG-4, which is the next, new international
> standard for digital video, for streaming, and for other uses. It
> delivers video quality as good as MPEG-2 at about a third less the
> bit rate."
>
> MPEG LA confirmed that a final license had yet to be hammered out and
> said the QuickTime release indicated faith on Apple's part that the
> licensing terms would be acceptable.
>
> "We don't have any new information on the licensing, and we hope that
> we'll have final terms sometime this summer," said Larry Horn, vice
> president of licensing and business development for MPEG LA. "That
> being said, Apple's announcement shows great confidence that a
> reasonable license from all the various patent holders will be
> available."
>
> MPEG-4 is the successor to the technologies that spawned the MP3
> audio explosion. Like most current media formats, its audio and video
> technologies aim to condense large digital packages into small files
> that can be easily transmitted online. But the hype around the
> technology focuses on its potential to give video itself the kind of
> interactivity now found only in Web sites and video games.
>
> Hoping to bank on this interest for patent holders, MPEG-4 in January
> proposed imposing a per-minute charge on streaming, a requirement
> that Apple and other potential MPEG-4 adopters consider too costly.
> Apple unveiled the new version of its streaming media software
> featuring MPEG-4 technology in February, but it delayed the version's
> release because of the licensing dispute. RealNetworks also has
> raised concerned about the licensing plan.
>
> The proposed terms include a one-year grace period from the time the
> program starts and covers uses before the launch of the license.
> Industry sources said they expected the final licensing agreement to
> mirror those terms.
>
> Under pressure
> One prominent MPEG-4 figure noted that MPEG LA is under pressure to
> offer competitive licensing terms, and that pressure may have helped
> reassure Apple that it could release the QuickTime software before
> the final license.
>
> "MPEG LA has been talking to many potential licensees, and they're
> taking comments from the market very seriously," said Rob Koenen,
> chairman of the MPEG Requirements Group. "They're looking at this as
> a product that they have to sell, and the price has to be right."
>
> Apple plans to release QuickTime 6 with Jaguar, the next version of
> Mac OS X, in late summer. QuickTime 6 would be the first Mac OS X
> media player to support MPEG-4.
>
> Currently, only Apple and Microsoft offer Mac OS X media players. But
> Microsoft's media player only works as a standalone or with the
> Internet Explorer 5.1 browser. Windows Media Player for Mac OS X is
> not compatible with rival browsers such as AOL Time Warner's Netscape
> 6.
>
> RealNetworks has committed to releasing a Mac OS X version of its
> media player, but it has yet to do so.
>
> "The ISMA (Internet Streaming Media Alliance) is pleased that
> industry support for MPEG-4 remains strong, as is evidenced by
> Apple's latest announcement," said ISMA President Tom Jacobs. "The
> ISMA membership continues to work toward interoperable approaches for
> transporting and viewing rich media, and we believe that MPEG-4 is a
> superb content choice. We look forward to MPEG-LA soon publishing
> final licensing terms, and the ISMA has high expectations that
> amenable terms for all will be reached."
>
> Tuesday's release of the QuickTime 6 beta could be viewed as a
> pre-emptive strike against Microsoft, which is expected this summer
> to offer a test version of its next-generation digital media client
> and server software, code-named Corona. Microsoft has not yet
> committed to supporting MPEG-4, working instead on its own
> proprietary codecs and streaming technologies.
>
> More importantly, Microsoft does not plan to initially offer a Corona
> player for the Mac when the technology debuts later this year.
>
> "We'll focus on other platforms like the Mac primarily to ensure
> Windows Media content playback," said Jonathan Usher, director of the
> Windows Digital Media Division at Microsoft. "There will not be a
> separate Corona player in that time frame."
>
> Usher said he "can't comment" about whether Microsoft would release a
> Corona player for the Mac. "Our focus right now for the Corona time
> frame is Windows XP and other versions of Windows."
>
> News.com's Paul Festa contributed to this report.
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Craig Birkmaier
> Pcube Labs
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss lists.m4if.org
> http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list