[M4IF Discuss] RE: [M4IF News] To those concerned about MPEG- 4 Licensing ...

[Larry Horn]

As many of you know from our prior emails responding to specific questions, we also see the communications and are listening.
Regards,
Larry Horn
-----Original Message-----
From: Haidamus, Ramzi [mailto:RXH   dolby.com]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2024 1:15 PM
To: 'Rob Koenen'; Jeyendran Balakrishnan
Cc: discuss   lists.m4if.org
Subject: RE: [M4IF Discuss] RE: [M4IF News] To those concerned about
MPEG- 4 Licensing ...
Speaking for the Audio Patent Group, yes we are tuned in and we are all
ears!
Ramzi
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Koenen [mailto:rkoenen   intertrust.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2024 10:02 AM
To: Jeyendran Balakrishnan; 'Rob Koenen'
Cc: discuss   lists.m4if.org
Subject: RE: [M4IF Discuss] RE: [M4IF News] To those concerned about MPEG- 4
Licensing ...
> I was  basically hoping that MPEG-LA
> regularly reads this discussion list, and that they will
> clearly understand the public reaction,
> and easen their position accordingly. But I guess that may be a naive
> belief! 

They actually do read the list, and so do many licensors, but they do 
not always respond. 
We had a good disxussion last Friday when MPEG LA and representatives for
the Ausdio licensing were at the special M4IF meeting on licensing. Things
are still in flux.
My advice to contact MPEG LA was also aimed at those that do not 
send their opinion to this list. You will see very few official statements
fromlarge corporations on lists like these, even thought they may have
(strong) opinions.
Larry Horn (LHorn   mpegla.com) is MPEG LA's VP of licensing who works on
MPEG-4 licensing.
Regards,
Rob
> 
> Can you let the list know how one may forward comments to MPEG-LA?
> 
> Regards:
> Jeyendran
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Koenen [mailto:rkoenen   intertrust.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2024 8:00 PM
> To: Yuval Fisher
> Cc: discuss   lists.m4if.org
> Subject: RE: [M4IF Discuss] RE: [M4IF News] To those concerned about
> MPEG- 4 Licensing ...
> 
> 
> > >         As for me, I'm looking at MPEG-4 Part 10 and hoping
> > that it is
> > > patent-free ;-)
> > 
> > 
> > I wouldn't hold your breath. Many companies are nervous about
> > submarine
> > patents. There's a strong anti-free-license movement in MPEG. 
> 
> Sweeping statements like these are very unhelpful.
> 
> It may indeed be unlikley that full JVT codec is going to be RF 
> (Royalty-Free). There is, however,  a strong desire among many parties 
> to try and establish a RF baseline. There is an ongoing effort to see 
> how such an RF baseline could be established. It is area in which 
> people like to maneuver carefully, for obvious reasons.
> 
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss   lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss   lists.m4if.org http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
--------------------
This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not
the intended recipient, delete this message. If you are not the intended
recipient, disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any action based on
this message is strictly prohibited.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss   lists.m4if.org
http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss