[M4IF Discuss] Names / Part 10

[Peter Haighton]

Hello,
just to weigh in on this, it really depends on who you are talking to for
the name.
People from MPEG generally will call it
JVT, MPEG-4 Part 10, or AVC
while ITU people generally use
H.26L, JVT or AVC.
I suppose the real name is AVC and each organization will adopt the
standard as they see fit. For example MPEG-2 is also known as H.262.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-admin   lists.m4if.org
[mailto:discuss-admin   lists.m4if.org]On Behalf Of Rob Koenen
Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2024 3:59 PM
To: 'Daniel B. Miller'; discuss   lists.m4if.org
Subject: RE: [M4IF Discuss] Names / Part 10
On this one, you need to talk to MPEG.
M4IF has no influence over names MPEG chooses.
Anyway, it will always be "MPEG-4 AVC". (just
like there is MPEG-2 AAC and MPEG-4 AAC
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel B. Miller [mailto:dan   on2.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2024 12:44
> To: discuss   lists.m4if.org
> Subject: Re: [M4IF Discuss] Names / Part 10
>
>
> sorry to respond late to this thread, just noticed --
>
> Our company (On2 technologies) has an audio codec dubbed
> "AVC".  I think
> it would be best to avoid names that could cause market confusion.
>
> Seems like "MPEG-4 part 10" is being used commonly -- why it
> can't just be
> MPEG-10 I don't know, that seems easier to remember.
>
>  ___  Dan Miller
> (++,) CTO and founder, On2 Technologies
>
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Klaus Diepold wrote:
>
> > Iain,
> >
> > how about "Advanced Video Coding" or "AVC" ?
> >
> > Klaus Diepold
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Iain Richardson (ensigr)" <i.g.richardson   rgu.ac.uk>
> > To: <discuss   lists.m4if.org>
> > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 5:50 PM
> > Subject: [M4IF Discuss] Names / Part 10
> >
> >
> > > The JVT draft standard is due to become Part 10 of MPEG-4
> and also ITU-T
> > > H.264. Does anyone have a feel for the likely "popular"
> name for the
> > > standard ? E.g. many people still refer to it as H.26L;
> "14496 Part 10"
> > > isn't very catchy, nor is H.264. Any opinions ?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Iain Richardson
> > > www.vcodex.com
> > > Video Coding Research and Consultancy
> > > www.eng.rgu.ac.uk
> > > The Robert Gordon University
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Discuss mailing list
> > > Discuss   lists.m4if.org
> > > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss   lists.m4if.org
> > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss   lists.m4if.org
> http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss   lists.m4if.org
http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss