[M4IF Discuss] What the??

Rob Koenen rkoenen intertrust.com
Fri May 24 09:24:08 EDT 2002


> Question (short response is OK): - I wasn't paying attention back then
(too
> busy building actual MPEG-4 product I guess :-) - when/how did MPEG-LA
> decide that it got the right to do for MPEG-4 what they do for MPEG-2? 

This was not MPEG LA's decision, but the decision of the 
patent holders. They get to choose who represents them.
MPEG never asked MPEG LA anything.
M4IF suggested end of '99 that MPEG LA could be a candidate 
to facilitate the evaluation of patents for essentiality
and to call the first meeting of patent holders.
After that, it was in the hands of the owners of essential
patents. I have not been in the discussions, but I believe 
that the patent holders asking MPEGLA to act as the licensing 
agent was not a foregone conclusion, when they got to make
that decision after a few meetings.
Best,
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William J. Fulco [mailto:wjf   NetworkXXIII.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 8:10
> To: Daniel B. Miller; Craig Birkmaier
> Cc: discuss   lists.m4if.org; discuss-admin   lists.m4if.org
> Subject: RE: [M4IF Discuss] What the??
> 

> 
> 
> ++Bill
> ---------------------------------
> William J. Fulco
> wjf   NetworkXXIII.com
> 310-927-4263 (Cell)
> 
> Ne cede malis sed contra audientor ito!
> 
> 



More information about the Discuss mailing list