[M4IF Technotes] Re: [M4IF Infolist] Doubt!

[Jani Huoponen]

Hi,
Chandra is right. Another point is that the Visual standard does not 'care'
how the objects are placed in the display, the standard only defines the
requirements or constraints for compatible decoders. For example, the
maximum number of macro blocks per second the decoder has to be able to
decode for certain profile and level. It is the 14496-1 standard that
concentrates on the issues like displaying of objects.
br, Jani
-----Original Message-----
From: G Chandra Sekhar Reddy [mailto:gchandra   tataelxsi.co.in]
Sent: 8. lokakuuta 2001 13:34
To: ramanathan; M4IF TechNotes
Subject: [M4IF Technotes] Re: [M4IF Infolist] Doubt!
Hi,
I don't think the restrictions posed by you on the placings of the objects
are valid.
There can even be overlaps of objects!
Chandra Sekhar Reddy G.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: ramanathan <mailto:ramanathan481   hotmail.com>  
To: Jani.Huoponen   hantro.com <mailto:Jani.Huoponen   hantro.com>  ;
infolist   lists.m4if.org <mailto:infolist   lists.m4if.org>  
Cc: rks   cradle.com <mailto:rks   cradle.com>  
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2023 3:08 PM
Subject: [M4IF Infolist] Doubt!
I have a doubt regarding the composition of objects in case of 396
macroblocks for 4 objects.I beg your time to read the doument in which I
have raised my doubt.
Thank you.
Ramanathan.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/mp4-tech/attachments/20011008/8f044f8b/attachment.html