[Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document

[=?big5?B?TGkuTWcgW6f1slHB4l0=?=]

Dear experts, 
    I'm also confused about the case of MacroBlock to Slice group of 8.2.2.8 in ITU-T H.264 (2003/05) version.
    8.2.2.8:
    "Otherwise (frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal to 0 and field_pic_flag is
     equal to 0), the macroblock to slice group map is specified by:
    MbToSliceGroupMap[ i ] = mapUnitToSliceGroupMap[ ( i / ( 2 * PicWidthInMbs ) ) * PicWidthInMbs
    + ( i % PicWidthInMbs ) ]"
    when parameter : frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal to 0 and field_pic_flag is
     equal to 0 --> it means this is a coded frame with all the MacroBlocks are field MarcoBlocks ?
BR,
MG Li
  _____  
[Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document
Gary Sullivan garysull <mailto:mp4-tech%40lists.mpegif.org?Subject=%5BMp4-tech%5D%20about%20H.264/AVC%20standard%20document&In-Reply-To=>  windows.microsoft.com 
Mon Jan 24 09:24:36 ESTEDT 2005 
*	Previous message: [Mp4-tech] AAC <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004762.html>  transparency bitrates for sampling rates other than 44.1? 
*	Next message: [Mp4-tech] MPEG4, MPEG2, and <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004767.html>  MPEG1 
*	Messages sorted by: [ date ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/date.html#4766>  [ thread ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/thread.html#4766>  [ <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/subject.html#4766>  subject ] [ author ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/author.html#4766>  
  _____  
With field_pic_flag equal to 0 and mb-aff turned off, I think you're talking about an ordinary frame.
BTW you should get ahold of something more recent than G050r1.  That's from several iterations ago.
-G.
________________________________
        From: mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech>  [mailto:mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech> ] On Behalf Of ???
        Sent: Monday, January 24, 2024 3:01 AM
        To: mp4-tech lists.mpegif.org <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech> 
        Subject: [Mp4-tech] about H.264/AVC standard document
        hello,experts:
            In h.264/AVC standard document(JVT-G050r1,Page 86) there is a paragraph about FMO decoding:
            "Otherwise (frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal     to 0 and field_pic_flag is equal to 0), the macroblock to slice group map is specified     by:
            MbToSliceGroupMap[ i ] = mapUnitToSliceGroupMap[ ( i / ( 2 * PicWidthInMbs ) ) *         PicWidthInMbs + ( i % PicWidthInMbs ) ]                  (8-27)"
             who can tell me what's the picture type(frame or field or others) if "frame_mbs_only_flag is equal to 0 and mb_adaptive_frame_field_flag is equal to 0 and field_pic_flag is equal to 0"?
             thanks!
             ronggang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/mp4-tech/attachments/20050124/5856f54f/attachment.html
  _____  
*	Previous message: [Mp4-tech] AAC <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004762.html>  transparency bitrates for sampling rates other than 44.1? 
*	Next message: [Mp4-tech] MPEG4, <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/004767.html>  MPEG2, and MPEG1 
*	Messages sorted by: [ date ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/date.html#4766>  [ thread <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/thread.html#4766>  ] [ subject ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/subject.html#4766>  [ author ] <http://lists.mpegif.org/pipermail/mp4-tech/2005-January/author.html#4766>  
  _____  
More <http://lists.mpegif.org/mailman/listinfo/mp4-tech>  information about the Mp4-tech mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/mp4-tech/attachments/20050318/f044441f/attachment-0001.html