[Mp4-tech] legality on using test vector names in test report
Gary Sullivan
garysull windows.microsoft.com
Mon Aug 13 22:17:56 EDT 2007
That's a publicly available spec. Talk about them all you want. In fact I think you can make a few thousand CD ROMs containing the conformance spec and the bitstreams themselves and hand them out like candy. No one will complain.
And there is no need to buy those from ISO. You can just download them for free from
http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2489/Ittf_Home/PubliclyAvailableStandards.htm
The free availability of those bitstreams is totally approved by ISO.
Best Regards,
Gary Sullivan
________________________________
From: Neelakanth [mailto:neel2265 yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2023 9:05 PM
To: Gary Sullivan; mp4-tech lists.mpegif.org
Subject: RE: [Mp4-tech] legality on using test vector names in test report
Gary and all,
I mean "conformance bitstreams". For MPEG4 these are as defined in the ISO_IEC_14496-4. We bought these from the ISO.
My question is "when we publish test report for a codec" it is not sufficient just to say that "Decoder passes all the test vectors from codec committe". In my view a good test report should have the conformance bitstreams names also. Is it legal to put the bitstream names in the report? As bitstream names give out information like
-- name of the company: mat000.m4v: "mat", nec002.m4v: "nec"
-- bitstream properties
Thanks and Regards,
Neelakanth
Gary Sullivan <garysull windows.microsoft.com> wrote:
Neelakanth,
What do you mean by "test vector"? Where did you get these "test vectors" that you're talking about?
Best Regards,
Gary Sullivan
________________________________
From: mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org [mailto:mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org] On Behalf Of Neelakanth
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2023 7:10 AM
To: mp4-tech lists.mpegif.org
Subject: [Mp4-tech] legality on using test vector names in test report
Dear experts,
This mail is on legality of using the test vector names.
Can we mention the test vector names in the MPEG4 and MPEG2 decoder test report?
If no then what are the modalities? Can some body guide me to right set of documents?
Thanks and Regards,
Neelakanth
________________________________
Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=47094/*http://farechase.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTFicDJoNDllBF9TAzk3NDA3NTg5BHBvcwMxMwRzZWMDZ3JvdXBzBHNsawNlbWFpbC1uY20-> with Yahoo! FareChase.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: Please use clear subject lines for your posts. Include [audio, [video], [systems], [general] or another apppropriate identifier to indicate the type of question you have.
Note: Conduct on the mailing list is subject to the Antitrust guidelines found at http://www.mpegif.org/public/documents/vault/mp-out-30042-Antitrust.php
________________________________
Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48256/*http://travel.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTFhN2hucjlpBF9TAzk3NDA3NTg5BHBvcwM1BHNlYwNncm91cHMEc2xrA2VtYWlsLW5jbQ--> on Yahoo! Travel.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/mp4-tech/attachments/20070813/2818a816/attachment.html
More information about the Mp4-tech
mailing list