[Mp4-tech] Exp-Golomb code

[Gary Sullivan]

Eric Chai et al,
I think perhaps/hopefully there may be no cases where an se(v) actually uses an exp-Golomb code that long, although what you are saying does sound like it makes sense.
Best Regards,
Gary Sullivan
________________________________
From: mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org [mailto:mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org] On Behalf Of Eric Chai
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2024 11:14 PM
To: mp4-tech lists.mpegif.org
Subject: [Mp4-tech] Exp-Golomb code
Hi all,
In the JM reference code (ver. 13.2) the code for decoding a SE (linfo_se function) defines "n" as a 32 bit signed integer.  So if I have a 63 bit exp-Golomb code, the function will compute "n" as a negative number.  Shouldn't this be a unsigned 32 bit integer ?
Thank,
-Eric
________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51438/*http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/mp4-tech/attachments/20080124/7a776436/attachment.html