[M4IF Discuss] Names / Part 10

[Daniel B. Miller]

sorry to respond late to this thread, just noticed --
Our company (On2 technologies) has an audio codec dubbed "AVC".  I think
it would be best to avoid names that could cause market confusion.
Seems like "MPEG-4 part 10" is being used commonly -- why it can't just be
MPEG-10 I don't know, that seems easier to remember.
 ___  Dan Miller
(++,) CTO and founder, On2 Technologies
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Klaus Diepold wrote:
> Iain,
>
> how about "Advanced Video Coding" or "AVC" ?
>
> Klaus Diepold
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Iain Richardson (ensigr)" <i.g.richardson   rgu.ac.uk>
> To: <discuss   lists.m4if.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 5:50 PM
> Subject: [M4IF Discuss] Names / Part 10
>
>
> > The JVT draft standard is due to become Part 10 of MPEG-4 and also ITU-T
> > H.264. Does anyone have a feel for the likely "popular" name for the
> > standard ? E.g. many people still refer to it as H.26L; "14496 Part 10"
> > isn't very catchy, nor is H.264. Any opinions ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Iain Richardson
> > www.vcodex.com
> > Video Coding Research and Consultancy
> > www.eng.rgu.ac.uk
> > The Robert Gordon University
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss   lists.m4if.org
> > http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss   lists.m4if.org
> http://lists.m4if.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>