[Mp4-tech] Frame rate in h.264

Gary Sullivan garysull windows.microsoft.com
Mon Jul 18 11:49:56 EDT 2005


Probably we ought to change that example in E.2.1 in the next
corrigendum.  The example in the NOTE near the end of D.2.2 is better.
Best Regards,
Gary Sullivan
+> -----Original Message-----
+> From: mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org 
+> [mailto:mp4-tech-bounces lists.mpegif.org] On Behalf Of John Cox
+> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2023 3:27 AM
+> To: mp4-tech lists.mpegif.org
+> Subject: Re: [Mp4-tech] Frame rate in h.264
+> 
+> Glenn
+> 
+> The table you need to look at is E-6 (under the description of
+> fixed_frame_rate_flag).
+> 
+> Once you've worked through all the verbiage what it says is that the
+> duration of a field picture is 1x 
+> num_units_in_tick/time_scale and the
+> duration of a frame picture is 2x 
+> num_units_in_tick/time_scale. (If you
+> specify pic_struct then other options are available too for 3/2 pull
+> down etc.)
+> 
+> I agree that the example given is misleading and I guess 
+> that the sample
+> I saw came from the Main Concept encoder.
+> 
+> JC
+> 
+> >John,
+> >
+> >Thanks for the help, somehow skipped over this at first read.
+> >
+> >As you suggest, some samples did not have VUI in them.  
+> I'll have to 
+> >come up with an alternative.
+> >
+> >However, a sample I made with the Main Concept h.264 
+> encoder did have 
+> >the VUI info in it.  It is an NTSC sample and has 
+> num_units_in_tick = 
+> >900,900 and time_scale equal to 27,000,000.  Which gives 
+> you a FRAME 
+> >RATE of 29.97.  Seems correct to me, but based on your email you 
+> >suggest this should be the field rate instead.
+> >
+> >>From my copy of h.264 "ITU-T Rec. H.264 (03/2005) - Prepublished 
+> >version", I include the following:
+> >
+> >"For example, when the clock frequency of a video signal is 
+> 30000 / 1001 
+> >Hz, time_scale may be 30 000 and num_units_in_tick may be 1001."
+> >
+> >Now this clearly seems to be a reference to the NTSC frame 
+> rate, and 
+> >suggests the numbers are correct to me, though the text is 
+> less clear 
+> >than one might like.
+> >
+> >On Thursday 14 July 2023 10:07 am, John Cox wrote:
+> >> Glenn
+> >>
+> >> You can get the info from the VUI (in SPS) from the timing_info
+> >> fields (num_units in tick, time_scale, fixed_frame_rate_flag). 
+> >> Unfortunately these fields are optional and very few encoders fill
+> >> them in.  Indeed in the only recent example I've seen 
+> where they were
+> >> filled in the encoder had got the value wrong by a factor of two.
+> >> num_units_in_tick/time_scale should yield field time (or 
+> half frame
+> >> time if progressive) rather than frame time.
+> >>
+> >> John Cox
+> >> SJ Consulting Ltd
+> >>
+> >> >In MPEG-2 you could just parse the SEQ header and pull 
+> out some bits
+> >> > to determine if the frame rate is 29.97/NTSC or 25/PAL 
+> or whatever.
+> >> >
+> >> >I don't see any obvious way to determine this from a .264 stream,
+> >> > other than by figuring it out based on the number of 
+> frames and the
+> >> > time elapsed, but given that there could be repeats 
+> that might be
+> >> > more complex than I'd like.
+> >> >
+> >> >Thanks,
+> >> >Glenn
+> >> >
+> >> >_______________________________________________
+> >> >NOTE: Please use clear subject lines for your posts. 
+> Include [audio,
+> >> > [video], [systems], [general] or another apppropriate 
+> identifier to
+> >> > indicate the type of question you have.
+> >> >
+> >> >Note: Conduct on the mailing list is subject to the Antitrust
+> >> > guidelines found at
+> >> > 
+> http://www.mpegif.org/public/documents/vault/mp-out-30042-Antitrust
+> >> >.php
+> >
+> >
+> >_______________________________________________
+> >NOTE: Please use clear subject lines for your posts. 
+> Include [audio, [video], [systems], [general] or another 
+> apppropriate identifier to indicate the type of question you have.
+> >
+> >Note: Conduct on the mailing list is subject to the 
+> Antitrust guidelines found at 
+> http://www.mpegif.org/public/documents/vault/mp-out-30042-Ant
+> itrust.php
+> 
+> 
+> _______________________________________________
+> NOTE: Please use clear subject lines for your posts. Include 
+> [audio, [video], [systems], [general] or another 
+> apppropriate identifier to indicate the type of question you have.
+> 
+> Note: Conduct on the mailing list is subject to the 
+> Antitrust guidelines found at 
+> http://www.mpegif.org/public/documents/vault/mp-out-30042-Ant
+> itrust.php
+> 


More information about the Mp4-tech mailing list